Superconducting phases of Bi and Ga induced by deposition on a Ni sublayer
J. S. Moodera, R. Meservey
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.179 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Thin films of Bi and Ga deposited at 300 K on thin Ni underlayers are strongly coupled superconductors at liquid-helium temperature. A layer of 0.1–5.0 nm of Ni apparently seeds a superconducting phase in each of these metals. For Bi films Tc≤4 K, with an energy gap 2Δ≤1.30 meV; for Ga films Tc≤7 K and 2Δ≤2.30 meV. For both elements 2Δ/kTc≊4.2. The superconductivity of the Bi film was not confined to the interface, but extended throughout the film up to thicknesses of at least 40 nm, as was shown by tunneling studies on each surface of the film. X-ray diffraction shows that the Bi films grow pseudomorphically as an fcc phase with the lattice parameter of 5.71 Å, in contrast to the orthorhombic structure of bulk Bi. Upper critical fields were measured as a function of temperature and were several teslas. Ga films with or without seeding with Ni show only a disordered structure by x-ray diffraction. Electron-spin-polarization tunneling studies indicate that the Ni underlayers up to a thickness of about 2.0 nm are not ferromagnetic.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ga Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi3Ni Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BiNi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Comment on ‘‘Superconducting phases of Bi and Ga induced by deposition on a Ni sublayer’’
similarity 0.97J. A. van Hulst et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Superconducting phases of Bi and Ga induced by deposition on a Ni sublayer’ ’’
similarity 0.94J. S. Moodera & R. Meservey
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrostatic Tuning of the Superconductor-Insulator Transition in Two Dimensions
similarity 0.94Kevin A. Parendo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of cluster size on the normal- and superconducting-state properties of granular Bi films
similarity 0.94C. Vossloh et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic-flux periodic response of nanoperforated ultrathin superconducting films
similarity 0.94M. D. Stewart, Jr. et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hot-electron effects in the two-dimensional superconductor-insulator transition
similarity 0.94Kevin A. Parendo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified