Flux-line-cutting effects at the critical current of cylindrical type-II superconductors
Antonio Pérez-González, John R. Clem
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.4100 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Our critical-state model, which includes the effects of both flux-line cutting and flux pinning, is applied to a current-carrying cylinder in an axial magnetic field. The time evolution of the internal magnetic-field distribution is computed for currents just slightly above the critical current at which a longitudinal electric field first appears. According to the theory, when an axial magnetic field is nonzero, a unique magnetic-field distribution is ultimately produced. On the other hand, when the axial magnetic field is zero, the final magnetic-field distribution, longitudinal magnetic moment, and critical current all depend upon the sample’s magnetic history.
Similar papers
Theory of flux cutting and flux transport at the critical current of a type-II superconducting cylindrical wire
similarity 0.94John R. Clem
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux flow and flux cutting in type-II superconductors carrying a longitudinal current
similarity 0.93Gerald E. Marsh
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electromagnetic response of a thin type-II superconducting cylindrical shell
similarity 0.93Antonio Pérez-González & John R. Clem
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex Breaking and Cutting in Type II Superconductors
similarity 0.90A. Palau et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics of flux penetration and critical currents in type-II superconductors
similarity 0.90J. Shumway & S. Satpathy
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of flux cutting and flux transport at the critical current of a type-II superconducting cylindrical wire
similarity 0.90John R. Clem · 2011 · arXiv:1102.3678
Source status unknown — claims are unverified