Perturbation theory of superconducting micronetworks: Second-order and self-induction effects
J. I. Castro, A. López
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.1075 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The perturbation method to treat the nonlinear Ginzburg-Landau equations for micronetworks previously derived is extended to higher orders in the perturbation parameters, the temperature ΔT and magnetic field ΔH measured from the phase boundary. In this paper these two parameters are treated independently and the perturbation equations to all orders are analyzed. The theory allows for consideration of self-inductive effects. The importance of these for the interpretation of experimental results in micronetworks of type-I and type-II materials is pointed out. The Landau critical points have been discussed. Expressions for the relevant thermodynamic quantities are obtained. In particular, it is shown that the phase boundary satisfies the Ehrenfest-Keesom relations for second-order transitions. The theory has been explicitly worked out for simple geometries and compared with exact results, which have been obtained numerically. The lines separating different modes have been evaluated to second order for these cases.
Similar papers
Perturbation theory of superconducting micronetworks near the phase-transition boundary
similarity 0.92H. J. Fink et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of fluctuations on the transport properties of type-II superconductors in a magnetic field
similarity 0.87Salman Ullah & Alan T. Dorsey
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic derivation of superconductor-insulator boundary conditions for Ginzburg-Landau theory revisited: Enhanced superconductivity at boundaries with and without magnetic field
similarity 0.87Albert Samoilenka & Egor Babaev
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting micronets: A state-variable approach
similarity 0.87Herman J. Fink & Stephen B. Haley
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hybridization and interference effects for localized superconducting states in strong magnetic field
similarity 0.86Aladyshkin, A. Yu. et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1205.3992
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hybridization and interference effects for localized superconducting states in strong magnetic field
similarity 0.86A. Yu. Aladyshkin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified