Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Magnetic-flux profiles of high-Tc superconducting granules: Three-dimensional critical-state-model approximation’ ’’
R. Navarro, L. J. Campbell
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.14927 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The comment by Bhagwat and Chaddah raises concerns about numerically determining field-free regions in type-II superconductors, the use of Bean’s model in three dimensions, and asymptotic limits of the saturation magnetization in oblate and prolate spheroids. These concerns are answered.
Similar papers
Comment on ``Critical current density from magnetization hysteresis data using the critical-state model''
similarity 0.83P. Chaddah · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0106391
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thin superconducting disk with B-dependent Jc: Flux and current distributions
similarity 0.82D. V. Shantsev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modelling nonlocal electrodynamics in superconducting films: The case of a concave corner
similarity 0.82J. I Vestgarden & T. H. Johansen · 2012 · arXiv:1205.0338
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electric field in hard superconductors with arbitrary cross section and general critical current law
similarity 0.82A. Badía-Majós & C. López · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0403418
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Enhanced two-dimensional properties of the four-layered cuprate high-Tc superconductor TlBa2Ca3Cu4Oy”
similarity 0.81I. L. Landau & H. R. Ott
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
"Unusual" critical states in type-II superconductors
similarity 0.81E. H. Brandt & G. P. Mikitik · 2007 · arXiv:0708.1531
Source status unknown — claims are unverified