Comment on ``Critical current density from magnetization hysteresis data using the critical-state model''
P. Chaddah
arXiv:cond-mat/0106391 · 2001-06-20 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A recent paper [Physical Review {\bf B 64} 014508 (2001)] claims to present an exact method to extract the critical current density J$_C$ from the M-H hysteresis curve. We show that this claim appears unjustified.
Similar papers
Anomalous peak effect in iron-based superconductors BaKFeAs ( 0.69 and 0.76) for magnetic-field directions close to the plane and its possible relation to the spin paramagnetic effect
similarity 0.87Taichi Terashima et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1809.00762
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Use of a sigmoid function to describe second peak in magnetization loops
similarity 0.86Denis Gokhfeld · 2017 · arXiv:1709.10291
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Inferring equilibrium magnetization from hysteretic M−H curves of type-II superconductors
similarity 0.86P. Chaddah et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Expression with self-consistent magnetic units for calculation of critical current density using the Bean's Model
similarity 0.86M. Polichetti et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.09197
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic Derivation of Magnetic Flux Density Profiles, Magnetization Hysteresis Loops, and Critical Currents in Strongly Pinned Superconductors
similarity 0.86C. Reichhardt et al. · 1995 · arXiv:cond-mat/9509037
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A parameter-free method to extract the superconductor's field-dependence from in-field current-voltage characteristics of HTS tapes
similarity 0.86Víctor M. R. Zermeño et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1608.08378
Source status unknown — claims are unverified