Expression with self-consistent magnetic units for calculation of critical current density using the Bean's Model
M. Polichetti, A. Galluzzi, R. Kumar, A. Goyal
arXiv:2410.09197 · DOI 10.3390/ma18020269 · 2024-10-11
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
This study analyzes the calculation of the critical current density Jc,mag by means of Bean's critical state model, using the equation formulated by Gyorgy et al. and other similar equations derived from it reported in the literature. While estimations of Jc,mag using Bean's model are widely performed, improper use of different equations with different magnetic units and pre-factors leads to confusion and to significant errors in the reported values of Jc,mag. In this work, a SINGLE general equation is proposed for the calculation of Jc,mag for a rectangular parallelepiped sample in perpendicular field using Bean's critical state model, underlying how the simple conversion of magnetic units can lead to a Jc,mag in the desired units, without the need to introduce any other correction or use other specific equations depending on the units of Jc,mag. In this equation, the numerical pre-factor is dimensionless, independent of the unit system used. A comparison between the expression reported in the literature is done, showing how they can lead to different results depending on the used units, and that these results can be at least one order of magnitude different from the correct results obtained with the general equation proposed in this work. This resolves all ambiguities and aligns with the correct dimensional analysis, eliminates discrepancies in the calculated Jc,mag, and will avoid further propagation of errors in the literature.
Similar papers
Consistent estimation of the critical current density of a superconductor from hysteresis loops
similarity 0.86Ratan Lal · 2008 · arXiv:0810.5035
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Best practices for a proper evaluation and conversion of physical property equations in superconductors: the examples of WHH formulation, Bean model and other cases of interest
similarity 0.86Chiara Tarantini et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2602.04973
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Higher critical currents yet faster vortex creep in EuBaCuO films containing coherent artificial pinning centers
similarity 0.86Jiangteng Liu et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2507.01119
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electric field in hard superconductors with arbitrary cross section and general critical current law
similarity 0.85A. Badía-Majós & C. López · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0403418
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ``Critical current density from magnetization hysteresis data using the critical-state model''
similarity 0.85P. Chaddah · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0106391
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Generalized critical-state model for hard superconductors
similarity 0.85Ming Xu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified