← Back to search

Correlation of the superconducting transition to oxygen stoichiometry in single-crystal Ba1−xKxBiO3−y

W. D. Mosley, J. W. Dykes, P. Klavins, R. N. Shelton, P. A. Sterne, R. H. Howell

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.611 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Temperature-dependent positron-lifetime experiments have been performed from room temperature to 15 K on single crystals of the oxide superconductor Ba1−xKxBiO3−y. Results indicate that the filling of oxygen vacancies has a marked impact on the superconducting properties of this system. Cation defect concentrations were below the detectable limit of positron-annihilation-analysis techniques in this material, which is in sharp contrast to identical studies on polycrystalline samples. We find that the positron lifetime in these electrochemically deposited single crystals is determined by the oxygen stoichiometry of the lattice, but there is no experimental signature of strong positron localization. By performing a subsequent oxygen anneal on the crystals, the superconducting transition is sharpened and the onset is raised. The observed change in positron lifetime associated with this annealing procedure is in quantitative agreement with theory.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Ba1-xKxBiO3-y

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

32Pressure not reportedunknown
Ba1-xKxBiO3-y

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30.8Pressure not reportedonset
Ba1-xKxBiO3-y

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

28Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers