Comment on ‘‘Theory of impure superconductors: Anderson versus Abrikosov and Gor’kov’’
A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor’kov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12337 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A response is given to a criticism in a paper by Kim and Overhauser of an earlier work by Abrikosov and Gor’kov on superconductors with impurities. The criticism is based on a primitive misunderstanding of the nature of the attraction of electrons achieved by phonons. As it was explained by the present authors in several publications, there exists a complete equivalence of their results with the later work by Anderson.
Similar papers
Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Theory of impure superconductors: Anderson versus Abrikosov and Gor’kov’ ’’
similarity 0.93Yong-Jihn Kim & A. W. Overhauser
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of impure superconductors: Anderson versus Abrikosov and Gor’kov
similarity 0.89Yong-Jihn Kim & A. W. Overhauser
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing Constraint on the Real Space Formalism of the Theory of Superconductivity
similarity 0.87Yong-Jihn Kim · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9609102
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to "Comment on 'Isotope effect in high-Tc superconductors' "
similarity 0.85Dale R. Harshman et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1202.0588
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to “Comment on ‘Isotope effect in high-Tc superconductors’ ”
similarity 0.85Dale R. Harshman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pair-transfer superconductivity in the Anderson model
similarity 0.83B. Nathanson & O. Entin-Wohlman
Source status unknown — claims are unverified