Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Theory of impure superconductors: Anderson versus Abrikosov and Gor’kov’ ’’

Yong-Jihn Kim; A. W. Overhauser

doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12339

← Back to search

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Theory of impure superconductors: Anderson versus Abrikosov and Gor’kov’ ’’

Yong-Jihn Kim, A. W. Overhauser

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12339 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

That the Abrikosov-Gor’kov theory of an impure superconductor seriously violates Anderson’s theorem is reaffirmed. The contrary assertion, together with other statements in the Comment, are shown to be incorrect physically, mathematically, and historically.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

Formula	Reported Tc (K)	Pressure (GPa)	Type
Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
Hg Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown