Transition from superconductivity to heavy-fermion behavior in U-doped Lu2Fe3Si5
A. Mielke, W. W. Kim, J. J. Rieger, G. Fraunberger, E.-W. Scheidt, G. R. Stewart
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.16522 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In the superconductor Lu2Fe3Si5 (Tc=6.25 K) lutetium can be replaced by uranium up to a maximum of 40% [(Lu0.6U0.4)2Fe3Si5], maintaining the original P4/mnc structure. When the uranium content in (Lu1−xUx)2Fe2Si5 is increased the superconductivity vanishes and a heavy-fermion state is built up. Already for small amounts of uranium there is a strong suppression of superconductivity (Tc=1.8 K for x=0.01). According to the Abrikosov-Gorkov theory this suppression can be described by a strong exchange coupling between the uranium 5f electrons and the conduction electrons. In agreement with this high exchange coupling we detect drastically reduced magnetic (uranium) moments. For low dopings (x<0.1) there is no significant change of the Sommerfeld parameter γ. When the U content exceeds x>0.1 there is a strong γ increase. The enhanced specific heat remains unchanged when the sample is exposed to a magnetic field of 13 T. This field-independent specific heat, the screened magnetic moments, and the Wilson ratio χ/γ corroborate that the increase in γ is indeed indicative of an enhanced effective mass and not a result of magnetic entropy. Just like in other U-based systems (e.g., UPt3 and UBe13) the evolution of the heavy-fermion state in (UxLu1−x)2Fe3Si5 cannot merely be explained by a pure single-ion Kondo effect. The fact that the γ enhancement begins only after the U content exceeds x>0.1 points out that collective phenomena (i.e., interaction between the U ions) play a decisive role for the evolution of the heavy-fermion state in this system. Cerium-doped samples (Lu1−xCex)2Fe3Si5 revealed a distinctly weaker Tc suppression (Tc=1.9 K for x=0.1), less reduced magnetic moments, and no significant γ enhancement.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lu2Fe3Si5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Lu2Fe3Si5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.12 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| (Lu0.99U0.01)2Fe3Si5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (Lu0.9Ce0.1)2Fe3Si5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Disorder-sensitive superconductivity in the doped iron silicide superconductor (Lu1−xRx)2Fe3Si5 (R=Sc, Y, and Dy)
similarity 0.94Tadataka Watanabe et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-gap superconductivity in Lu2Fe3Si5: A transverse-field muon spin rotation study
similarity 0.94P. K. Biswas et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-gap superconductivity seen in penetration-depth measurements of Lu2Fe3Si5 single crystals
similarity 0.93R. T. Gordon et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic phase transition and partially gapped Fermi surface in superconducting Lu5Ir4Si10
similarity 0.92R. N. Shelton et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic excitations and ordering in the heavy-electron superconductor URu2Si2
similarity 0.91C. Broholm et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge density wave and superconductivity competition in Lu5Ir4Si10: A proton irradiation study
similarity 0.91Maxime Leroux et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified