Comment on ‘‘Angle dependence of the upper critical field of superconducting superlattices’’
Toshiya Iwai, Shogo Miyake, Kenji Takanaka
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.12013 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We point out that Peierls substitution used by Estrera and Arnold [Phys. Rev. B 39, 2094 (1989)] leads to incorrect results for the eigenvalue to determine the angle dependence of the upper critical field.
Similar papers
Origin of the anisotropic upper critical fields in single crystals of superconducting rare-earth ternary borides
similarity 0.82G. K. Shenoy & S. K. Malik
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiquantum vortices in conventional superconductors with columnar defects near the upper critical field
similarity 0.81Gregory M. Braverman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on 'Magnetic levitation force and penetration depth in type-II superconductors'
similarity 0.81A. Badía
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase boundary of a cubic superconducting circuit in a magnetic field of arbitrary magnitude and direction
similarity 0.81Chia-Ren Hu & Chen-Hong Huang
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stable hc/e vortices in a gauge theory of superconductivity in strongly correlated systems
similarity 0.80Subir Sachdev
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Field-Enhanced Diamagnetism in the Pseudogap State of the Cuprate Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Superconductor in an Intense Magnetic Field”
similarity 0.80Lucía Cabo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified