← Back to search

Bilayer coupling in the yttrium-barium family of high-temperature superconductors

A. J. Millis, H. Monien

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.16172 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We derive the expressions needed to interpret experiments relating to interplane magnetic coupling in YBa2Cu3O6+x and related materials, and use the results to interpret measurements of the optical magnon energy in YBa2Cu3O6.2 and of the NMR ‘‘cross-relaxation’’ rate in Y2Ba4Cu7O15. We estimate J⊥∼14 meV in both materials, and χmax/μB2∼100 states/eV Cu in Y2Ba4Cu7O15 at T=100 K. We show that there is at present no obvious contradiction between the results of a widely used analysis of NMR experiments and the results of neutron scattering experiments in the Y-Ba system. We argue that the 41 meV excitation observed in superconducting YBa2Cu3O7 is a collective mode pulled down below the superconducting gap by interactions, and that the observed antisymmetry under interchange of planes follows from the non-negligible value of J⊥. © 1996 The American Physical Society.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3O6+x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O6.2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Y2Ba4Cu7O15

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers