Relationship between the lattice parameter and superconductivity in the 2-1-4 series n-type cuprates
Cong Wang, Cheng Dong, Guangcan Che, Zhiyu Qiao, Hong Chen, Zhongxian Zhao
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.3935 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The superconductivity of R2−x−yLayCexCuO4−δ (R=Nd, Gd, y=0, 0.2, 0.5,..., 1.4. x=0.10,..., 0.15,..., 0.25) series are studied. The solubility limit of La3+ in Nd1.85−yLayCe0.15CuO4−δ is determined to be ylim=1.3, while the Ce-solubility limit increases to Xlim=0.25 in Nd0.7−xLa1.3CexCuO4−δ with the maximum lattice parameter a=3.995 Å. The Tcon and the bulk superconducting fraction are found to decrease with increasing La content. However, the reduction of superconductivity induced by increasing lattice constant a can be compensated by a proper decrease of Ce content irrespective of the lattice parameter a up to 3.982 Å. These results indicate that the lattice parameters are not directly related to the superconductivity. Actually, both the change of the a parameter and the Ce content x induce a variation in oxygen vacancies δ and result in the change of the charge-carrier density. Taking these facts into account, we give a simplified formula to calculate the charge-carrier density n0 as n0=x+2δ=x+2(Aa+Bx+C0). In order to keep an optimum charge-carrier density for superconductivity, the variations in oxygen vacancies induced by the change of lattice parameter a must be compensated by an appropriate decrease of Ce dopant. This implies that the a parameter, doping concentration, oxygen vacancy, and the charge-carrier density can be taken into unified consideration, in which the charge-carrier density is considered to be a determining factor for superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd1.65La0.2Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd1.65La0.2Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd1.35La0.5Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd1.35La0.5Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd1.15La0.7Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd1.15La0.7Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.9La0.95Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.9La0.95Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.85La1.0Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.85La1.0Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.8La1.1Ce0.10CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.8La1.1Ce0.10CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.78La1.1Ce0.12CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.78La1.1Ce0.12CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.75La1.1Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.65La1.2Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nd0.55La1.3Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Lattice Instabilities in Cuprate Superconductors: A Possible Limiting Mechanism for Tc
similarity 0.95M. Lang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure studies on the n-type doped superconductors R2−xMxCuO4−δ (R=Pr,Nd,Sm; M=Ce,Th) and Nd2CuO4−xFx by electron-energy-loss spectroscopy
similarity 0.95M. Alexander et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity-Insensitive Order at q∼1/4 in Electron-Doped Cuprates
similarity 0.95H. Jang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Specific heat and magnetic susceptibility of superconducting and semiconducting Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4−δ
similarity 0.95S. J. Collocott et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Macroscopic evidence for quantum criticality and field-induced quantum fluctuations in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.95A. D. Beyer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting-plasma resonance along the c axis in various copper oxide superconductors
similarity 0.95H. Shibata & T. Yamada
Source status unknown — claims are unverified