← Back to search

89Y NMR study of the effects of impurities on and between the CuO2 planes in high-Tc superconducting cuprates

G. V. M. Williams, J. L. Tallon

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.10984 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have performed 89Y NMR, susceptibility and thermoelectric power measurements on the Y1−xCaxBa2−xLaxCu4O8 superconductor to investigate the effects of impurities between the superconducting CuO2 planes. The results are compared with Zn and Ni impurities in YBa2Cu4O8 that substitute primarily for Cu within each superconducting CuO2 plane. Interplanar impurities result in negligible pair breaking while intraplanar impurities lead to a rapid depression in Tc. This is consistent with two-dimensional superconductivity within each CuO2 plane and weak interplanar coupling. The Ca, La, Zn, and Ni impurities all lead to similar increases in the 89Y NMR linewidth at 293 K with increasing impurity concentration indicating, contrary to previous reports, that an induced local moment is not responsible for the linewidth increase.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Y1-xCaxBa2-xLaxCu4O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

80Pressure not reportedonset
YBa2Cu4-zZnzO8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu4-zNizO8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Y1-xCaxBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers