← Back to search

Model for c-axis resistivity of cuprate superconductors

Ratan Lal, Ajay, R. L. Hota, S. K. Joshi

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.6126 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

On the basis of the structural features and correlation effects that exist in the cuprate systems it has been argued that the Cu 3d3z2−r2 orbitals are reasonably well suited for the transport along the c axis. On the same ground it has also been argued that the band of the out-of-plane states that involves the Cu 3d3z2−r2 orbitals lies higher than the occupied in-plane states by an amount W(n) that decreases with the carrier density (n) so as to vanish beyond a certain critical concentration n0. Phenomenological arguments are used to obtain expressions for ρc within the Boltzmann framework for all n. When n<n0, ρc shows a semiconducting behavior for T<W and a metallic behavior for T>W. For n>n0 it turns out that ρc is metallic for all T. The observed temperature dependence of ρc is explained reasonably by the present model for a number of samples of La2−xSrxCuO4, YBa2Cu3O7−y, and Bi2Sr2−xLaxCuOy with different dopings. The values of W(n) estimated for these samples support one of the main features of our model that this gap W(n) decreases with increasing n.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7-y

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2-xLaxCuOy

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers