← Back to search

Tunneling spectroscopy of superconducting Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4−δ

S. Kashiwaya, T. Ito, K. Oka, S. Ueno, H. Takashima, M. Koyanagi, Y. Tanaka, K. Kajimura

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.8680 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The superconducting electronic states of Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4−δ (NCCO) are studied by applying the phase-sensitive capability of tunneling spectroscopy. Unlike the YBa2Cu3O7−δ cases, the conductance spectra measured on (100)-, (110)- and (001)-oriented surfaces showed V-shaped gap structures, and no zero-bias conductance peaks were observed even around steps on the surfaces. The present results reject the possibility of dx2−y2-wave and dxy-wave symmetries for the pair potential in NCCO. The experimental spectra are well fitted to theoretical curves of anisotropic s-wave symmetry with a large smearing factor.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

17.5Pressure not reportedunknown
Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

17.2Pressure not reportedunknown
Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers