Penetration depth in conventional layered superconductors: A proximity-effect model
S. P. Zhao, Q. S. Yang
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.14630 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We propose a theory for the penetration depth λ(T) of superconducting bilayers and multilayers, which are composed of two dissimilar superconducting layers S and S′ with arbitrary coupling strength, and with the S layer thickness (Tc,S>Tc,S′) less than or comparable to its coherence length. Within the framework of the theory, we discuss the influences of the S′ layer parameters, and of the coupling strength between the S′ and S layers. We show that their variations lead to a variety of temperature dependences of λ(T). Many of the basic features observed experimentally in conventional SS′ structures have been reproduced. The theory begins with an extension of the proximity-effect model developed by Golubov et al. [Phys. Rev. B 51, 1073 (1995)], which is based on the Usadel equations. It therefore applies to the dirty SS′ system, and provides a description of the superconducting properties over the entire temperature range below Tc, the transition temperature of the system. We shall compare our model with a phenomenological model developed within the proximity-effect theory which is applicable near Tc. A brief discussion on the highly anisotropic systems in connection with the intrinsically layered high-Tc superconductors is also presented.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Proximity effect of a ferromagnetic insulator in contact with a superconductor
similarity 0.93T. Tokuyasu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity-induced gap in nanowires with a thin superconducting shell
similarity 0.93Thomas Kiendl et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface barrier in mesoscopic type-I and type-II superconductors
similarity 0.93Alexander D. Hernández & Daniel Domínguez
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Finite-size effects in a nanowire strongly coupled to a thin superconducting shell
similarity 0.93Christopher Reeg et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable proximity effects and topological superconductivity in ferromagnetic hybrid nanowires
similarity 0.93Samuel D. Escribano et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic mechanism of electric-field-induced superconductivity suppression in metallic thin films
similarity 0.92Alessio Zaccone et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified