Magnetic exchange coupling through superconductors: A trilayer study
C. A. R. Sá de Melo
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.12303 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The possibility of magnetic exchange coupling between two ferromagnets (F) separated by a superconductor (S) spacer is analyzed using the functional integral method. For this coupling to occur three prima facie conditions need to be satisfied. First, an indirect exchange coupling between the ferromagnets must exist when the superconductor is in its normal state. Second, superconductivity must not be destroyed due to the proximity to ferromagnetic boundaries. Third, roughness of the F/S interfaces must be small. Under these conditions, when the superconductor is cooled to below its critical temperature, the magnetic coupling changes. The appearance of the superconducting gap introduces a new length scale (the coherence length of the superconductor) and modifies the temperature dependence of the indirect exchange coupling existent in the normal state. The magnetic coupling is oscillatory both above and below the the critical temperature of the superconductor, as well as strongly temperature-dependent. However, at low temperatures the indirect exchange coupling decay length is controlled by the coherence length of the superconductor, while at temperatures close to and above the critical temperature of the superconductor the magnetic coupling decay length is controlled by the thermal length.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nd2-xCexCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd2-xCexCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic Exchange Fields and Domain Wall Superconductivity at an All-Oxide Superconductor-Ferromagnet Insulator Interface
similarity 0.98S. Komori et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transverse thermomagnetic effects in the mixed state and lower critical field of high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.98Mark W. Coffey
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of strong magnetic fields on pairing fluctuations in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.98M. Eschrig et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic Exchange Coupling in Ferromagnet/Superconductor/Ferromagnet Multilayers
similarity 0.97C. A. R. Sá de Melo
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-fluctuation effects on superconductivity
similarity 0.97P. J. Williams & J. P. Carbotte
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluctuations of vortices in layered high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.97L. N. Bulaevskii et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified