Electronic and magnetic properties of the electron-doped superconductor Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4−δ
B. K. Cho, Jae Hoon Kim, Young Jin Kim, Beom-hoan O, J. S. Kim, G. R. Stewart
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.214504 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Temperature-dependent magnetization [M(T)] and specific heat [Cp(T)] measurements were carried out on single crystal Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4−δ (Tc=16.5K). The magnetic anisotropy in the static susceptibility χ≡M/H is apparent not only in its magnitude but also in its temperature dependence, with χ⊥ for H⊥c larger than χ‖ for H‖c. For both field orientations, χ does not follow the Curie-Weiss behavior due to the small energy gap of the J=7/2 multiplet above the J=5/2 ground-state multiplet. With increasing temperature, however, χ‖(T) exhibits a broad minimum near 100 K and then a slow increase while χ⊥(T) shows a monotonic decrease. A sharp peak in Cp(T) at 4.7 K manifests an antiferromagnetic ordering. The electronic contribution, γ, to Cp(T) is estimated to be γ=103.2(7)mJ/moleSmK2. The entropy associated with the magnetic ordering is much smaller than Rln2, where R is the gas constant, which is usually expected for the doublet ground state of Sm+3. The unusual magnetic and electronic properties evident in M(T) and Cp(T) are probably due to a strong anisotropic interaction between conduction electrons and localized electrons at Sm+3 sites.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Determination of the upper critical field of the electron-doped superconductor Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4−y from resistive fluctuations
similarity 0.97S. H. Han et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field-Dependent Diamagnetic Transition in Magnetic Superconductor Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4−y
similarity 0.97R. Prozorov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-Fermi-Surface Superconducting State and a Nodal d-Wave Energy Gap of the Electron-Doped Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4−δ Cuprate Superconductor
similarity 0.96A. F. Santander-Syro et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Inhomogeneous Electronic Structure Probed by Spin-Echo Experiments in the Electron Doped High-Tc Superconductor Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4−y
similarity 0.95F. Zamborszky et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Freestanding single-crystal superconducting electron-doped cuprate membrane
similarity 0.94S. Sandik et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double resistive superconducting transition in Sm2−xCexCuO4−y
similarity 0.94E. A. Early et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified