← Back to search

Field-Dependent Diamagnetic Transition in Magnetic Superconductor Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4−y

R. Prozorov, D. D. Lawrie, I. Hetel, P. Fournier, R. W. Giannetta

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.147001 · Physical Review Letters

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The magnetic penetration depth of single crystal Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4−y was measured down to 0.4 K in dc fields up to 7 kOe. For insulating Sm2CuO4, Sm3+ spins order at the Néel temperature, TN=6 K, independent of the applied field. Superconducting Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4−y (Tc≈23 K) shows a sharp increase in diamagnetic screening below T*(H) which varied from 4.0 K (H=0) to 0.5 K (H=7 kOe) for a field along the c axis. If the field was aligned parallel to the conducting planes, T* remained unchanged. The unusual field dependence of T* indicates a spin-freezing transition that dramatically increases the superfluid density.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4-y

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

23Pressure not reportedunknown
Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4-y

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4-y

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
ErNi2B2C

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
SmRh4B4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers