Superconducting phase with fractional vortices in the frustrated kagomé wire network at f=1/2
Kyungwha Park, David A. Huse
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.134522 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In classical XY kagomé antiferromagnets, there can be a low-temperature phase where ψ3=ei3θ has quasi-long-range order but ψ is disordered, as well as more conventional antiferromagnetic phases where ψ is ordered in various possible patterns (θ is the angle of orientation of the spin). To investigate when these phases exist in a physical system, we study superconducting kagomé wire networks in a transverse magnetic field when the magnetic flux through an elementary triangle is a half of a flux quantum. Within Ginzburg-Landau theory, we calculate the helicity moduli of each phase to estimate the Kosterlitz-Thouless (KT) transition temperatures. Then at the KT temperatures, we estimate the barriers to move vortices and the effects that lift the large degeneracy in the possible ψ patterns. The effects we have considered are inductive couplings, nonzero wire width, and the order-by-disorder effect due to thermal fluctuations. The first two effects prefer q=0 patterns, while the last one selects a 3×3 pattern of supercurrents. Using the parameters of recent experiments, we conclude that at the KT temperature, the nonzero wire width effect dominates, which stabilizes a conventional superconducting phase with a q=0 current pattern. However, by adjusting the experimental parameters, for example by bending the wires a little, it appears that the ψ3 superconducting phase can instead be stabilized. The barriers to vortex motion are low enough that the system can equilibrate into this phase.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Symmetric and asymmetric states in a mesoscopic superconducting wire in the voltage-driven regime
similarity 0.94D. Y. Vodolazov & F. M. Peeters
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting wires and fractional flux
similarity 0.94C. A. R. Sá de Melo
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortices induced in a superconducting loop by asymmetric kinetic inductance and their detection in transport measurements
similarity 0.94G. R. Berdiyorov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of the boundary conditions on the current flow pattern along a superconducting wire
similarity 0.93Jorge Berger
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Controlled dephasing of Andreev states in superconducting quantum point contacts
similarity 0.93M. A. Despósito & A. Levy Yeyati
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of incomplete superconducting condensation in S-wave superconductors
similarity 0.92Ju. H. Kim
Source status unknown — claims are unverified