Superconductivity and magnetism of Sm1.85−xGdxCe0.15CuO4−δ and Gd2−yCeyCuO4−δ crystals
Y. Nagata, T. Shioga, T. Taniguchi, T. Uchida, L. Zhang, M. D. Lan, H. Samata
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.104506 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The magnetism and superconductivity of Sm1.85−xGdxCe0.15CuO4−δ and Gd2−yCeyCuO4−δ crystals were investigated. In the Sm1.85−xGdxCe0.15CuO4−δ system, superconductivity is suppressed by Gd substitution, and temperature-induced magnetic transitions appear at 3, 7, and 135 K above x=1.2 Cu spins have an antiferromagnetic (AF) order along the [110] direction among these transitions, and a weak-ferromagnetic (WF) moment due to a canting of Cu spins appears along the [1¯10] direction at T<~3K and 7K<~T<~135K. The AF order at 3K<~T<~7K changes into a canted spin configuration via field-induced spin reorientation and induces the WF moment. The Néel temperature TNCu (135 K at x=1.2) and spin-reorientation temperature TSR (7 K at x=1.2), which are due to the Cu sublattice and are observed at low field intensity, increase with increasing x. Sm spins have an antiferromagnetic order along the [001] direction at x=0 below the Néel temperature TNR (∼5 K), but TNR, which is observed for low x at high field intensity, decreases with increasing x and disappears at x≈1. Gd spins have an antiferromagnetic order along the [1¯10] direction for specimens with x>1.4 near 3 K. The change in the geometry of rare-earth and Cu spins resulting from Gd substitution is considered to be the reason for the suppression of superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sm1.85-xGdxCe0.15CuO4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Gd2-yCeyCuO4-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| R2-yCeyCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Upper critical field of a Sm1.85Ce0.15CuO4−y single crystal: Interaction between superconductivity and antiferromagnetic order in copper oxides
similarity 0.93Y. Dalichaouch et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of granular superconductivity in polycrystalline Sm2−xCexCuO4−y
similarity 0.93H. A. Blackstead et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nature of magnetic relaxation in a superconducting Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4−y single crystal
similarity 0.93L. Fábrega et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Prediction of superconductivity in Am2−zCezCuO4
similarity 0.92Howard A. Blackstead & John D. Dow
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and Field-Induced Magnetism in Pr2−xCexCuO4 Single Crystals
similarity 0.92J. E. Sonier et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Predicted properties of Nd1.5Ce0.5Sr2Cu2NbO10 and related high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.92Howard A. Blackstead & John D. Dow
Source status unknown — claims are unverified