← Back to search

Interlayer tunneling spectroscopy and doping-dependent energy-gap structure of the trilayer superconductor Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10+δ

Yoshiharu Yamada, Kenkichi Anagawa, Takasada Shibauchi, Takenori Fujii, Takao Watanabe, Azusa Matsuda, Minoru Suzuki

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.054533 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The superconducting gap, the pseudogap, and their doping and temperature dependences have been measured by the short-pulse interlayer tunneling spectroscopy for the CuO2 triple-layer high−Tc superconducting Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10+δ system. It is found for a nearly optimally doped sample that the superconducting gap magnitude is ≈80meV and the pseudogap is ≈120 meV, the values of which are slightly larger than those for CuO2 double-layer system. Both gap magnitudes show a clear tendency to decrease with increasing doping. In an underdoped sample, a clear dip-and-hump structure is observed, which declines with increasing doping and tends to diminish in overdoped samples. The relationship between unchanged Tc and decreasing superconducting gap in the overdoped region is discussed in terms of the proximity effect applied to the inequivalent doping model. We also discuss the dip-and-hump structure in comparison with other spectroscopic results. Finally, we argue an important implication of the increasing maximum Josephson current and the decreasing superconducting gap magnitude, both with increasing doping.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

107Pressure not reportedonset
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers