Non-Ohmic critical fluctuation conductivity of layered superconductors in a magnetic field
I. Puica, W. Lang
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.212503 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Thermal fluctuation conductivity for a layered superconductor in perpendicular magnetic field is treated in the frame of the self-consistent Hartree approximation for an arbitrarily strong in-plane electric field. The simultaneous application of the two fields results in a slightly stronger suppression of the superconducting fluctuations, compared to the case when the fields are applied individually.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O6-x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 92 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Scaling behavior of fluctuation conductivity of high-temperature superconductors in a magnetic field
similarity 0.95D. H. Kim et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of impurity scattering on microwave conductivity of a dx2−y2 superconductor
similarity 0.95E. Schachinger & J. P. Carbotte
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Broader perspective on the high-temperature superconducting YBa2Cu3Oy system: The real role of the oxygen content
similarity 0.95Y. Tokura et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure dependence of high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.95R. Griessen
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional energetics of the pseudogap state and superconducting state in high-Tc cuprates
similarity 0.95D. N. Basov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Oscillatory Melting Temperature of the Vortex Smectic Phase in Layered Superconductors
similarity 0.95S. N. Gordeev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified