← Back to search

Electronic and superconducting properties of oxygen-ordered MgB2 compounds of the form Mg2B3Ox

Juan C. Idrobo, Serdar Öğüt, Taner Yildirim, Robert F. Klie, Nigel D. Browning

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.172503 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Possible candidates for the Mg2B3Ox nanostructures observed in bulk of polycrystalline MgB2 [Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3970 (2002)] have been studied using a combination of Z-contrast imaging, electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), and first-principles calculations. The electronic structures, phonon modes, and electron phonon coupling parameters are calculated for two oxygen-ordered MgB2 compounds of composition Mg2B3O and Mg2B3O2, and compared with those of MgB2. We find that the densities of states for both Mg2B3Ox structures show very good agreement with EELS, indicating that they are excellent candidates to explain the observed coherent oxygen precipitates. Incorporation of oxygen reduces the transition temperature and gives calculated TC values of 18.3 and 1.6 K for Mg2B3O and Mg2B3O2, respectively.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

40Pressure not reportedunknown
Mg2B4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

40.73Pressure not reportedunknown
Mg2B3O

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

18.31Pressure not reportedunknown
Mg2B3O2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.62Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers