← Back to search

Comment on “Superconducting anisotropy and evidence for intrinsic pinning in single crystalline MgB2”

M. Angst, R. Puzniak, A. Wisniewski, J. Roos, H. Keller, J. Karpinski

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.226501 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. B 66, 012501 (2002)], torque data measured on a MgB2 single crystal in fields from 10to60kOe at 10K were presented. The authors obtained the anisotropy γ by fitting a theoretical expression to the data and concluded that the anisotropy is field-independent, γ≈4.3. In this Comment, we show that the above conclusion does not hold, because it was obtained based on the analysis of torque data measured in fields close to or above the upper critical field Hc2, where the theoretical expression used is not applicable. Furthermore, we argue that the experimental torque data with H⪡Hc2 indicate an anisotropy strongly increasing with increasing field.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers