← Back to search

Reply to “Comment on ‘Superconducting anisotropy and evidence for intrinsic pinning in single crystalline MgB2’ ”

Ken’ichi Takahashi, Toshiyuki Atsumi, Nariaki Yamamoto, Mingxiang Xu, Hideaki Kitazawa, Takekazu Ishida

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.226502 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We respond to the Comment by Angst et al. and report the analysis that our assumption of the upper critical field ηHc2 is reasonable.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers