← Back to search

Electronic inhomogeneity and competing phases in electron-doped superconducting Pr0.88LaCe0.12CuO4−δ

Pengcheng Dai, H. J. Kang, H. A. Mook, M. Matsuura, J. W. Lynn, Y. Kurita, Seiki Komiya, Yoichi Ando

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.100502 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We use neutron scattering to demonstrate that electron-doped superconducting Pr0.88LaCe0.12CuO4−δ in the underdoped regime is electronically phase separated in the ground state, showing the coexistence of a superconducting phase with a three-dimensional antiferromagnetically ordered phase and a quasi-two-dimensional spin-density wave modulation. The Néel temperature of both antiferromagnetic phases decreases linearly with increasing superconducting transition temperature (Tc) and vanishes when optimal superconductivity is achieved. These results indicate that the electron-doped copper oxides are close to a quantum critical point, where the delicate energetic balance between different competing states leads to microscopic heterogeneity.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Pr0.88LaCe0.12CuO4-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

24Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Pr0.88LaCe0.12CuO4-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

21Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Pr0.88LaCe0.12CuO4-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

16Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers