← Back to search

Interplay of doping and structural modulation in superconducting Bi2Sr2−xLaxCuO6+δ thin films

Z. Z. Li, H. Raffy, S. Bals, G. van Tendeloo, S. Megtert

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.174503 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have studied the evolution of the structural modulation in epitaxial, c-axis-oriented, Bi2Sr2−xLaxCuO6+δ thin films when varying the La content x and for a given x as a function of oxygen content. A series of thin films with 0⩽x⩽0.8 has been prepared in situ by rf-magnetron sputtering and characterized by R(T) measurements, Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and x-ray diffraction techniques. The oxygen content of each individual film was varied by thermal annealing across the phase diagram. The evolution of the structural modulation has been thoroughly studied by x-ray diffraction in determining the variation of the amplitude of satellite reflections in special two axes 2θ∕θ−θ scans (reciprocal space scans). It is shown that the amplitude of the modulation along the c axis decreases strongly when x increases from 0 to 0.2. It is demonstrated that this variation is essentially governed by La content x and that changing the oxygen content by thermal treatments has a much lower influence, even becoming negligible for x>0.2. Such study is important to understand the electronical properties of Bi2Sr2−xLaxCuO6+δ thin films.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

20Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Bi2Sr1.95La0.05CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

20Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Bi2Sr1.9La0.1CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

20Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Bi2Sr1.8La0.2CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Bi2Sr1.7La0.3CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Bi2Sr1.6La0.4CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Bi2Sr1.5La0.5CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

20Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Tl2Ba2CuO6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

80Pressure not reportedunknown
HgBa2CuO6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

94Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers