Suppression of superconductivity by the localization of hole carriers in Ti-doped La1.85Sr0.15CuO4
Caixia Wang, Yuping Sun, Zhe Qu, Yuheng Zhang
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.144518 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The effects of Ti doping in the single-doped samples of La1.85Sr0.15Cu1−xTixO4(0⩽x⩽0.06) and the double-doped samples of La1.85−2xSr0.15+2xCu1−xTixO4(0⩽x⩽0.4) have been studied. The critical Ti doping level (above which the pure phase is not formed) of double-doped samples are much higher than that of the single-doped samples. For single-doped samples, the high valence Ti4+ would introduce extra electrons into the CuO2 plane, which leads to severe valence mismatch and prevents the formation of a pure phase sample at x>0.06 and the superconductivity is depressed at x>0.04. While for double-doped samples, the extra electrons introduced by the doping of Ti are compensated by increasing holes due to the increase of the Sr content, which lead to the valence balance in the system. Thus, the pure-phase samples are formed up to x=0.4 and the superconductivity can survive up to x=0.1. The resistivity for double-doped samples is three orders of magnitude smaller than that for single-doped samples at the same Ti doping content. The reason that Ti dopants suppress superconductivity is attributed to the localization of hole carriers.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.85Sr0.15Cu0.98Ti0.02O4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 31 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.85Sr0.15Cu0.96Ti0.04O4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26.1 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.81Sr0.19Cu0.98Ti0.02O4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32.9 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.77Sr0.23Cu0.96Ti0.04O4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32.8 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.73Sr0.27Cu0.94Ti0.06O4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.69Sr0.31Cu0.92Ti0.08O4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.65Sr0.35Cu0.9Ti0.1O4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Cation size control of structure, structural fluctuations, and superconductivity in L1.85M0.15CuO4
similarity 0.95Judith A. McAllister & J. Paul Attfield
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced superconducting Tc in the immiscible system (La1.85Sr0.15CuO4)x(Lu2Cu2O5)1−x
similarity 0.95S. Park et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Properties that change as superconductivity disappears at high-doping concentrations in La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.95J. B. Torrance et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bulk superconductivity in both tetragonal and orthorhombic solid solutions of (La1−xSrx)2CuO4−δ
similarity 0.94T. Nagano et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Isotope effect in La2−xSrxCuO4 superconductors
similarity 0.94Maria Ronay et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interface formation of semiconductors with high-Tc superconductors: Ge/La1.85Sr0.15CuO4
similarity 0.94Y. Gao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified