← Back to search

Suppression of superconductivity by the localization of hole carriers in Ti-doped La1.85Sr0.15CuO4

Caixia Wang, Yuping Sun, Zhe Qu, Yuheng Zhang

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.144518 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The effects of Ti doping in the single-doped samples of La1.85Sr0.15Cu1−xTixO4(0⩽x⩽0.06) and the double-doped samples of La1.85−2xSr0.15+2xCu1−xTixO4(0⩽x⩽0.4) have been studied. The critical Ti doping level (above which the pure phase is not formed) of double-doped samples are much higher than that of the single-doped samples. For single-doped samples, the high valence Ti4+ would introduce extra electrons into the CuO2 plane, which leads to severe valence mismatch and prevents the formation of a pure phase sample at x>0.06 and the superconductivity is depressed at x>0.04. While for double-doped samples, the extra electrons introduced by the doping of Ti are compensated by increasing holes due to the increase of the Sr content, which lead to the valence balance in the system. Thus, the pure-phase samples are formed up to x=0.4 and the superconductivity can survive up to x=0.1. The resistivity for double-doped samples is three orders of magnitude smaller than that for single-doped samples at the same Ti doping content. The reason that Ti dopants suppress superconductivity is attributed to the localization of hole carriers.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La1.85Sr0.15CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

37Pressure not reportedonset
La1.85Sr0.15Cu0.98Ti0.02O4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

31Pressure not reportedonset
La1.85Sr0.15Cu0.96Ti0.04O4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

26.1Pressure not reportedonset
La1.81Sr0.19Cu0.98Ti0.02O4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

32.9Pressure not reportedonset
La1.77Sr0.23Cu0.96Ti0.04O4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

32.8Pressure not reportedonset
La1.73Sr0.27Cu0.94Ti0.06O4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedonset
La1.69Sr0.31Cu0.92Ti0.08O4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedonset
La1.65Sr0.35Cu0.9Ti0.1O4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

17Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers