Hierarchy of critical temperatures in four-layered ferromagnet/superconductor nanostructures and control devices
Yurii N. Proshin, Alexei Zimin, Nail G. Fazleev, Mansur G. Khusainov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.184514 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The four-layered F∕S∕F′∕S′ nanostructure consisting of rather dirty superconducting (S) and ferromagnetic (F) metals is studied within the theory of the proximity effect taking detailed account of the boundary conditions. The F/S structures with four F and S layers are shown to have considerably richer physics than the F/S/F trilayer (due to the interplay between the 0 and π phase superconductivity and the 0 and π phase magnetism) and even the F/S superlattices. The extra π phase superconducting states obtained for the four-layered F∕S∕F′∕S′ system are found to be different from the known “superlattice” states. The dependence of the critical temperatures versus the F layer thicknesses is investigated. An optimal set of parameters is determined, for which the difference between the critical temperatures for different states becomes significant, and the corresponding phase diagrams are plotted. It is proven that this system can have different critical temperatures for different S and S′ layers. A conceptual scheme of a control device with superconducting and magnetic recording channels that can be controlled separately using a weak external magnetic field is proposed on the basis of the F∕S∕F′∕S′ nanostructure. The devices with four, five, six, and seven different states are explored.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe/V/Fe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CuNi/Nb/CuNi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Gd/La Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Hierarchy of critical temperatures in four-layered ferromagnet/superconductor nanostructures and control devices
similarity 0.91Yurii N. Proshin et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1704.04940
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamic properties of ferromagnet/superconductor/ferromagnet nanostructures
similarity 0.90I. Baladié & A. Buzdin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetization-orientation dependence of the superconducting transition temperature calculated for F∕S∕F trilayer structures
similarity 0.90Chun-Yeol You et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possibility of periodically reentrant superconductivity in ferromagnet/superconductor layered structures
similarity 0.90M. G. Khusainov & Yu. N. Proshin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
First-order phase transitions in ferromagnetic/superconducting/ferromagnetic trilayers
similarity 0.90S. Tollis
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diagrams of ferromagnet-superconductor multilayers with misaligned exchange fields
similarity 0.89Tomas Löfwander et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified