Excitation gap of a graphene channel with superconducting boundaries
M. Titov, A. Ossipov, C. W. J. Beenakker
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.045417 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We calculate the density of states of electron-hole excitations in a superconductor–normal-metal–superconductor (SNS) junction in graphene, in the long-junction regime that the superconducting gap Δ0 is much larger than the Thouless energy ET=ℏv∕d (with v the carrier velocity in graphene and d the separation of the NS boundaries). If the normal region is undoped, the excitation spectrum consists of neutral modes that propagate along the boundaries—transporting energy but no charge. These “Andreev modes” are a coherent superposition of electron states from the conduction band and hole states from the valence band, coupled by specular Andreev reflection at the superconductor. The lowest Andreev mode has an excitation gap of E0=12(π−∣ϕ∣)ET, with ϕ∊(−π,π) the superconducting phase difference. At high doping (Fermi energy μ⪢ET) the excitation gap vanishes ∝E0(ET∕μ)2, and the usual gapless density of states of Andreev levels is recovered. We use our results to calculate the ϕ dependence of the thermal conductance of the graphene channel.
Similar papers
Decay Lengths for Diffusive Transport Activated by Andreev Reflections in Al/n-GaAs/Al Superconductor-Semiconductor-Superconductor Junctions
similarity 0.89J. Kutchinsky et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal Transport Properties of Graphene-Based F/S/F Junctions
similarity 0.89Morteza Salehi et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1110.6719
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev-Klein reflection in graphene ferromagnet-superconductor junctions
similarity 0.88Malek Zareyan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic field suppression of Andreev conductance at superconductor-graphene interfaces
similarity 0.88Piranavan Kumaravadivel et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.04844
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic Theory of the Andreev Gap
similarity 0.88Tobias Micklitz & Alexander Altland
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Detection of Valley Polarization in Graphene by a Superconducting Contact
similarity 0.88A. R. Akhmerov & C. W. J. Beenakker
Source status unknown — claims are unverified