← Back to search

Conventional s-wave pairing in the presence of spin fluctuations in superconducting Mo3Sb7 from specific heat measurements

C. Candolfi, B. Lenoir, A. Dauscher, J. Hejtmánek, E. Šantavá, J. Tobola

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.092509 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The superconducting properties of the spin fluctuation-superconductor Mo3Sb7 have been investigated by specific heat measurements down to 0.5K and under magnetic fields of up to 2T. The obtained temperature and magnetic field dependences of the electronic specific heat strongly suggest a conventional s-wave pairing, while possible (s+g)-wave pairing symmetry has been proposed earlier. In addition, the temperature dependence of the upper critical field Hc2 is fully consistent with the Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg theory predicting its behavior for a conventional phonon-mediated type II superconductor.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Mo3Sb7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.3Pressure unresolvedmidpoint
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YNi2B2C

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
PrOs4Sb12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers