Doping evolution of the electronic structure in the single-layer cuprate Bi2Sr2−xLaxCuO6+δ: Comparison with other single-layer cuprates
M. Hashimoto, T. Yoshida, H. Yagi, M. Takizawa, A. Fujimori, M. Kubota, K. Ono, K. Tanaka, D. H. Lu, Z.-X. Shen, S. Ono, Yoichi Ando
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.094516 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have performed angle-resolved photoemission and core-level x-ray photoemission studies of the single-layer cuprate Bi2Sr2−xLaxCuO6+δ (Bi2201) and revealed the doping evolution of the electronic structure from the lightly doped to optimally doped regions. We have observed the formation of the dispersive quasiparticle band, evolution of the Fermi “arc” into the Fermi surface, and the shift of the chemical potential with hole doping as in other cuprates. The doping evolution in Bi2201 is similar to that in Ca2−xNaxCuO2Cl2 (Na-CCOC), where a rapid chemical potential shift toward the lower Hubbard band of the parent insulator has been observed, but is quite different from that in La2−xSrxCuO4 (LSCO), where the chemical potential does not shift, yet the dispersive band and the Fermi arc and/or surface are formed around the Fermi level already in the lightly doped region. The (underlying) Fermi surface shape and band dispersions are quantitatively analyzed using tight-binding fit, and the deduced next-nearest-neighbor hopping integral t′ also confirms the similarity to Na-CCOC and the difference from LSCO.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2-xLaxCuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2-xLaxCuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2-xLaxCuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 34 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2-xLaxCuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Effect of pseudogap formation on the superconducting gap in underdoped cuprates
similarity 0.94E. Schachinger & J. P. Carbotte
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Normal-state electronic structure in the heavily overdoped regime of Bi1.74Pb0.38Sr1.88CuO6+δ single-layer cuprate superconductors: An angle-resolved photoemission study
similarity 0.94K. Yang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of out-of-plane disorder on the nodal quasiparticle and superconducting gap in single-layer Bi2Sr1.6L0.4CuO6+δ (L=La,Nd,Gd)
similarity 0.94M. Hashimoto et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonuniversal power law of the Hall scattering rate in a single-layer cuprate Bi2Sr2−xLaxCuO6
similarity 0.94Yoichi Ando & T. Murayama
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping evolution of the electronic structure in the single-layer cuprates BiSrLaCuO: Comparison with other single-layer cuprates
similarity 0.94M. Hashimoto et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0801.0782
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the pseudogap region of Bi2Sr1.4La0.6CuO6+δ from angular-dependent torque measurements
similarity 0.93T. Hu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified