Analysis of Bell inequality violation in superconducting phase qubits
Abraham G. Kofman, Alexander N. Korotkov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.104502 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze conditions for violation of the Bell inequality in the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt form, focusing on Josephson phase qubits. We start the analysis with maximum violation in the ideal case, and then take into account the effects of local measurement errors and decoherence. Special attention is paid to configurations of the qubit measurement directions in the pseudospin space lying within either horizontal or vertical planes; these configurations are optimal in certain cases. Besides local measurement errors and decoherence, we also discuss the effect of measurement crosstalk, which affects both the classical inequality and the quantum result. In particular, we propose a version of the BI which is insensitive to the crosstalk.
Similar papers
Manipulating Complex Hybrid Entanglement and Testing Multipartite Bell Inequalities in a Superconducting Circuit
similarity 0.89Y. Ma et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-Qubit Spectroscopy of Spatiotemporally Correlated Quantum Noise in Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.87Uwe von Lüpke et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Simulating the dynamical quantum Hall effect with superconducting qubits
similarity 0.86Xu-Chen Yang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence benchmarking of superconducting qubits
similarity 0.86Jonathan Burnett et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1901.04417
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Analysis of measurement errors for a superconducting phase qubit
similarity 0.86Qin Zhang et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0607385
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing the helical edge states of a topological insulator by Cooper-pair injection
similarity 0.86P. Adroguer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified