← Back to search

Impact of disorder outside the CuO2 planes of electron-doped superconductors: Different effect on localization and Tc between Gd and Sm doping

Chenghai Sun, Hongshun Yang, Lu Cheng, Jianbin Wang, Xiangyi Xu, Shaoqing Ke, Liezhao Cao

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.104518 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The thermopower S(T), Hall coefficient RH, and resistivity ρ(T) are studied for Nd1.85−xMxCe0.15CuO4±δ (M=Gd and Sm) single crystals. Disorder is introduced into the cation sites outside the CuO2 planes in the two systems and its degree is controlled by changing M content. Such doping nominally does not change the doped carrier density, which is confirmed by RH. S(T) is analyzed in terms of a semiempirical model above 120 K for both doping, which assumes the coexistence of a narrow electron band and a broad one. In this model, both the bandwidth for the density of states and the bandwidth of the effective conductivity broaden with increasing x for both doping, while the tendency for localization is increased for Gd doping but nearly unchanged for Sm doping, which could be understood by stronger electronic disorder for Gd doping than that for Sm doping. This may be resulted from the difference in ionic radius (Gd3+<Sm3+<Nd3+). Furthermore, for Gd doping the superconducting Tc is strongly depressed with increasing the doping concentration, while for Sm doping Tc is nearly unchanged with increasing Sm content, which implies that the superconducting Tc may be related to the localization and the band structure of the itinerant carriers.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nd1.85-xGdxCe0.15CuO4±δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Nd1.85-xSmxCe0.15CuO4±δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
NdGd0.85Ce0.15CuO4±δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers