Full counting statistics of crossed Andreev reflection
Jan Petter Morten, Daniel Huertas-Hernando, Wolfgang Belzig, Arne Brataas
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.224515 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We calculate the full transport counting statistics in a three-terminal tunnel device with one superconducting source and two normal-metal or ferromagnet drains. We obtain the transport probability distribution from direct Andreev reflection, crossed Andreev reflection, and electron transfer which reveals how these processes’ statistics are determined by the device conductances. The cross-correlation noise is a result of competing contributions from crossed Andreev reflection and electron transfer, as well as antibunching due to the Pauli exclusion principle. For spin-active tunnel barriers that spin polarize the electron flow, crossed Andreev reflection and electron transfer statistics exhibit different dependencies on the magnetization configuration and can be controlled by relative magnetization directions and voltage bias.
Similar papers
Full counting statistics of crossed Andreev reflection
similarity 0.94Jan Petter Morten et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0901.3551
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Full counting statistics of multiple Andreev reflection
similarity 0.91Göran Johansson et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0308086
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlocal Andreev reflection at high transmissions
similarity 0.90Mikhail S. Kalenkov & Andrei D. Zaikin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection effect on spin-polarized transport in ferromagnet/superconductor/ferromagnet double tunnel junctions
similarity 0.89Zhiming Zheng et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proposal for an All-Electrical Detection of Crossed Andreev Reflection in Topological Insulators
similarity 0.89Rolf W. Reinthaler et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Numerical model of crossed Andreev reflection and charge imbalance
similarity 0.89J. L. Webb et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified