← Back to search

Vortex lattice structure dependent on pairing symmetry in Rashba superconductors

Norihito Hiasa, Taro Saiki, Ryusuke Ikeda

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.014501 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Vortex lattice structures in Rashba noncentrosymmetric superconductors in magnetic fields parallel to the basal plane (H⊥c) are examined based on the BCS-like Hamiltonian and the resulting Ginzburg-Landau functional. Due to the momentum-dependent anisotropy of the Zeeman effect induced by the broken inversion symmetry, the vortex lattice in higher fields generally shows some unidirectional modulation of Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov type orienting in the plane perpendicular to H. However, the direction of the modulation and the lattice structure depend significantly on the underlying pairing symmetry: when the mixing between spin singlet and triplet pairing components is negligible, the resulting modulated structure tends to have reflection symmetry, while the vortex lattice in systems with a significant singlet-triplet mixing has no reflection symmetry in most cases. The latter result implying the presence in real materials of two degenerate orientations of the lattice structure separated by domain walls may be relevant to the extremely low-magnetic decay rate observed in CePt3Si.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CePt3Si

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
CeRhSi3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
CeIrSi3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers