← Back to search

Hall effect in superconducting Fe(Se0.5Te0.5) thin films

I. Tsukada, M. Hanawa, Seiki Komiya, T. Akiike, R. Tanaka, Y. Imai, A. Maeda

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.054515 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The Hall effect is investigated for eight superconducting Fe(Se0.5Te0.5) thin films grown on MgO and LaSrAlO4 substrates with different transition temperatures (Tc). The normal Hall coefficients (RH) have positive values with magnitude of 1∼1.5×10−3 cm3/C at room temperature for the all samples. With decreasing temperature, we find two characteristic types of behavior in RH(T) depending on Tc. For thin films with lower Tc (typically Tc<5 K), RH start decreasing approximately below T=250 K toward a negative side, some of which shows sign reversal at T=50∼60 K, but turns positive toward T=0 K. On the other hand, for the films with higher Tc (typically Tc>9 K), RH leaves almost unchanged down to T≈100 K, and then starts decreasing toward a negative side. Around the temperatures when RH changes its sign from positive to negative, obvious nonlinearity is observed in the field-dependence of Hall resistance as to keep the low-field RH positive while the high-field RH negative. Thus, the electronic state just above Tc is characterized by ne (electron density) >nh (hole density) with keeping μe<μh. These results suggest the dominance of electron density to the hole density is an essential factor for the occurrence of superconductivity in Fe-chalcogenide superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Fe(Se0.5Te0.5)

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9Pressure not reportedonset
FeSe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

36Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers