Theoretical analysis of drag resistance in amorphous thin films exhibiting superconductor-insulator transitions
Yue Zou (邹悦), Gil Refael, Jongsoo Yoon
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.104515 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The magnetical field tuned superconductor-insulator transition in amorphous thin films, e.g., Ta and InO, exhibits a range of yet unexplained curious phenomena, such as a putative low-resistance metallic phase intervening the superconducting and the insulating phase, and a huge peak in the magnetoresistance at large magnetic field. Qualitatively, the phenomena can be explained equally well within several significantly different pictures, particularly the condensation of quantum vortex liquid, and the percolation of superconducting islands embedded in normal region. Recently, we proposed and analyzed a distinct measurement in Y. Zou, G. Refael, and J. Yoon, Phys. Rev. B 80, 180503 (2009) that should be able to decisively point to the correct picture: a drag resistance measurement in an amorphous thin-film bilayer setup. Neglecting interlayer tunneling, we found that the drag resistance within the vortex paradigm has opposite sign and is orders of magnitude larger than that in competing paradigms. For example, two identical films as in G. Sambandamurthy, L. W. Engel, A. Johansson, and D. Shahar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 107005 (2004) with 25 nm layer separation at 0.07 K would produce a drag resistance ∼10−4 Ω according the vortex theory but only ∼10−12 Ω for the percolation theory. We provide details of our theoretical analysis of the drag resistance within both paradigms and report some results as well.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ta Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| InO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconducting correlations in thin films of amorphous indium oxide on the insulating side of the disorder-tuned superconductor-insulator transition
similarity 0.95I. Shammass et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Approach to a superconductor-to-Bose-insulator transition in disordered films
similarity 0.95Myles A. Steiner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electric breakdown effect in the current-voltage characteristics of amorphous indium oxide thin films near the superconductor-insulator transition
similarity 0.95O. Cohen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortices and Quasiparticles near the Superconductor-Insulator Transition in Thin Films
similarity 0.95Victor M. Galitski et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling probe of fluctuating superconductivity in disordered thin films
similarity 0.94David Dentelski et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum phase transitions in disordered two-dimensional superconductors
similarity 0.94Matthew P. A. Fisher
Source status unknown — claims are unverified