← Back to search

Superconductivity in iron silicide Lu2Fe3Si5 probed by radiation-induced disordering

A. E. Karkin, M. R. Yangirov, Yu. N. Akshentsev, B. N. Goshchitskii

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.054541 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Resistivity ρ(T), Hall coefficient RH(T), superconducting temperature Tc, and the slope of the upper critical field −dHc2/dT were studied in poly- and single-crystalline samples of the Fe-based superconductor Lu2Fe3Si5 irradiated by fast neutrons. Atomic disordering induced by the neutron irradiation leads to a fast suppression of Tc similarly to the case of doping of Lu2Fe3Si5 with magnetic (Dy) and nonmagnetic (Sc, Y) impurities. The same effect was observed in a novel FeAs-based superconductor La(O-F)FeAs after irradiation. Such behavior is accounted for by strong pair breaking that is traceable to scattering at nonmagnetic impurities or radiation defects in these unconventional superconductors. In such superconductors, the sign of the order parameter changes between the different Fermi sheets (s± model). Some relations that are specified for the properties of the normal and superconducting states in high-temperature superconductors are also observed in Lu2Fe3Si5. The first is the relationship −dHc2/dT ∼ Tc, which allows us to assign the compound Lu2Fe3Si5 to type II superconductors in the clean limit. The second is a correlation between the low-temperature linear coefficient a in the resistivity ρ = ρ0 + a1T, which appears presumably due to the scattering at magnetic fluctuations, and Tc, this correlation being an evidence of a tight relation between the superconductivity and magnetism. Data point to an unconventional (nonphononic) mechanism of superconductivity in Lu2Fe3Si5 and probably in some other Fe-based compounds, which can be fruitfully studied via the radiation-induced disordering.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Lu2Fe3Si5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6Pressure not reportedunknown
La(O-F)FeAs

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb3Sn

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
V3Si

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Mo3Si

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Mo3Ge

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Nd(O-F)FeAs

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers