Magnetic-crystallographic phase diagram of the superconducting parent compound Fe1+xTe
E. E. Rodriguez, C. Stock, P. Zajdel, K. L. Krycka, C. F. Majkrzak, P. Zavalij, M. A. Green
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.064403 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Through neutron diffraction experiments, including spin-polarized measurements, we find a collinear incommensurate spin-density wave with propagation vector k= [0.4481(4)012] at base temperature in the superconducting parent compound Fe1+xTe. This critical concentration of interstitial iron corresponds to x≈12% and leads to crystallographic phase separation at base temperature. The spin-density wave is short-range ordered with a correlation length of 22(3) Å, and as the ordering temperature is approached its propagation vector decreases linearly in the H direction and becomes long-range ordered. Upon further populating the interstitial iron site, the spin-density wave gives way to an incommensurate helical ordering with propagation vector k= [0.3855(2)012] at base temperature. For a sample with x≈9(1)%, we also find an incommensurate spin-density wave that competes with the bicollinear commensurate ordering close to the Néel point. The shifting of spectral weight between competing magnetic orderings observed in several samples is supporting evidence for the phase separation being electronic in nature, and hence leads to crystallographic phase separation around the critical interstitial iron concentration of 12%. With results from both powder and single crystal samples, we construct a magnetic-crystallographic phase diagram of Fe1+xTe for 5%<x<17%.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe1+xTe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Fe1+xSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Fe1+xTe0.7Se0.3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Fe1+xTe0.6Se0.4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba1-xKxFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Soft striped magnetic fluctuations competing with superconductivity in Fe1+xTe
similarity 0.93C. Stock et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of dynamic orbital correlations on magnetic excitations in the normal state of iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.92Wei-Cheng Lee et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature dependence of the resonance and low-energy spin excitations in superconducting FeTe0.6Se0.4
similarity 0.92Leland W. Harriger et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Amplitude, phase, and topological fluctuations shaping the complex phase diagram of two-dimensional superconductors
similarity 0.92Koichiro Furutani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic-crystallographic phase diagram of superconducting parent compound FeTe
similarity 0.92Efrain E. Rodriguez et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1105.1937
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin fluctuations and superconductivity in powders of Fe1+xTe0.7Se0.3 as a function of interstitial iron concentration
similarity 0.92C. Stock et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified