← Back to search

Anomalous temperature dependence of the superfluid density caused by a dirty-to-clean crossover in superconducting FeSe0.4Te0.6 single crystals

Hideyuki Takahashi, Yoshinori Imai, Seiki Komiya, Ichiro Tsukada, Atsutaka Maeda

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.132503 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report microwave surface impedances of FeSe0.4Te0.6 single crystals measured at 12, 19, and 44 GHz. The penetration depth exhibits a power-law behavior, δλL=λL(T)−λL(0)∝CTn with an exponent n≃2, which is considered to result from impurity scattering. The temperature dependence of the superfluid density largely deviates from the behavior expected in the BCS theory. We believe that this deviation is caused by the crossover from the dirty regime near Tc to the clean regime at low temperatures, which is supported by the rapid increase of the quasiparticle scattering time obtained from the microwave conductivity. We also believe that the previously published data of the superfluid density can be interpreted in this scenario.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
FeSe0.4Te0.6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

14Pressure not reportedonset
LaFeAsO1-xFx

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

28Pressure not reportedunknown
Fe1.03Se0.37Te0.63

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
LiFeAs

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers