← Back to search

Quantum oscillations of the superconductor LaRu2P2: Comparable mass enhancement λ≈1 in Ru and Fe phosphides

Philip J. W. Moll, Jakob Kanter, Ross D. McDonald, Fedor Balakirev, Peter Blaha, Karlheinz Schwarz, Zbigniew Bukowski, Nikolai D. Zhigadlo, Sergiy Katrych, Kurt Mattenberger, Janusz Karpinski, Bertram Batlogg

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.224507 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have studied the angular-dependent de Haas-van Alphen oscillations of LaRu2P2 using magnetic torque in pulsed magnetic fields up to 60 T. The observed oscillation frequencies are in excellent agreement with the geometry of the calculated Fermi surface. The temperature dependence of the oscillation amplitudes reveals effective masses m*(α)=0.71 and m*(β)=0.99 me, which are enhanced over the calculated band mass by λcyc of 0.8. We find a similar enhancement of λγ≈1 in comparing the measured electronic specific heat (γ=11.5 mJ/mol K2) with the total density of states from band-structure calculations. Remarkably, very similar mass enhancements have been reported in other pnictides, LaFe2P2, LaFePO (Tc≈4K), and LaRuPO, independent of whether they are superconducting or not. This is contrary to the common perceptions that the normal-state quasiparticle renormalizations reflect the strength of the superconducting pairing mechanism and leads to new questions about pairing in isostructural and isoelectronic Ru- and Fe-pnictide superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
LaRu2P2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4Pressure not reportedunknown
LaFePO

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers