Doping-dependent anisotropic superconducting gap in Na1−δ(Fe1−xCox)As from London penetration depth
K. Cho, M. A. Tanatar, N. Spyrison, H. Kim, Y. Song, Pengcheng Dai, C. L. Zhang, R. Prozorov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.020508 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The London penetration depth was measured in single crystals of self-doped Na1−δFeAs (from under doping to optimal doping, Tc from 14 to 27 K) and electron-doped Na(Fe1−xCox)As with x ranging from undoped, x=0, to overdoped, x=0.1. In all samples, the low-temperature variation of the penetration depth exhibits a power-law dependence, Δλ(T)=ATn, with the exponent that varies in a domelike fashion from n∼1.1 in the underdoped, reaching a maximum of n∼1.9 in the optimally doped, and decreasing again to n∼1.3 on the overdoped side. While the anisotropy of the gap structure follows a universal domelike evolution, the exponent at optimal doping, n∼1.9, is lower than in other charge-doped Fe-based superconductors (FeSCs). The full-temperature range superfluid density, ρs(T)=λ(0)/λ(T)2, at optimal doping is also distinctly different from other charge-doped FeSCs but is similar to isovalently substituted BaFe2(As1−xPx)2, believed to be a nodal pnictide at optimal doping. These results suggest that the superconducting gap in Na(Fe1−xCox)As is highly anisotropic even at optimal doping.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Na1-δFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Na1-δFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Na1-δFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 22 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| NaFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NaFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 31 | 3 GPa | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NaFe0.975Co0.025As Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| NaFe0.95Co0.05As Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NaFe0.972Co0.028As Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Role of covalent Fe-As bonding in the magnetic moment formation and exchange mechanisms in iron-pnictide superconductors
similarity 0.94K. D. Belashchenko & V. P. Antropov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of the band structure of superconducting NaFeAs from optimally doped to heavily overdoped Co substitution using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
similarity 0.94S. T. Cui et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Towards a quantitative description of tunneling conductance of superconductors: Application to LiFeAs
similarity 0.94A. Kreisel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crystal, spin, and electronic structure of the superconductor LiFeAs
similarity 0.93Zhi Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of iron-site defects on superconductivity in LiFeAs
similarity 0.93Shun Chi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological Superconductivity on the Surface of Fe-Based Superconductors
similarity 0.93Gang Xu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified