Towards a quantitative description of tunneling conductance of superconductors: Application to LiFeAs
A. Kreisel, R. Nelson, T. Berlijn, W. Ku, Ramakrishna Aluru, Shun Chi, Haibiao Zhou, Udai Raj Singh, Peter Wahl, Ruixing Liang, Walter N. Hardy, D. A. Bonn, P. J. Hirschfeld, Brian M. Andersen
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.224518 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Since the discovery of iron-based superconductors, a number of theories have been put forward to explain the qualitative origin of pairing, but there have been few attempts to make quantitative, material-specific comparisons to experimental results. The spin-fluctuation theory of electronic pairing, based on first-principles electronic structure calculations, makes predictions for the superconducting gap. Within the same framework, the surface wave functions may also be calculated, allowing, e.g., for detailed comparisons between theoretical results and measured scanning tunneling topographs and spectra. Here we present such a comparison between theory and experiment on the Fe-based superconductor LiFeAs. Results for the homogeneous surface as well as impurity states are presented as a benchmark test of the theory. For the homogeneous system, we argue that the maxima of topographic image intensity may be located at positions above either the As or Li atoms, depending on tip height and the setpoint current of the measurement. We further report the experimental observation of transitions between As- and Li-registered lattices as functions of both tip height and setpoint bias, in agreement with this prediction. Next, we give a detailed comparison between the simulated scanning tunneling microscopy images of transition-metal defects with experiment. Finally, we discuss possible extensions of the current framework to obtain a theory with true predictive power for scanning tunneling microscopy in Fe-based systems.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Impact of iron-site defects on superconductivity in LiFeAs
similarity 0.96Shun Chi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic-field-dependent pinning potential in LiFeAs superconductor from its Campbell penetration depth
similarity 0.96Plengchart Prommapan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic-Structure-Driven Magnetic and Structure Transitions in Superconducting NaFeAs Single Crystals Measured by Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy
similarity 0.95C. He et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
LiFeP: A nodal superconductor with an unusually large ΔCTc
similarity 0.95J. S. Kim et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
LiFeAs: An intrinsic FeAs-based superconductor with Tc=18 K
similarity 0.95Joshua H. Tapp et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced superfluid stiffness, lowered superconducting transition temperature, and field-induced magnetic state of the pnictide superconductor LiFeAs
similarity 0.94F. L. Pratt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified