← Back to search

Interplay of superconductivity and charge density wave ordering in pseudoternary alloy compounds: Lu2Ir3(Si1−xGex)5, Lu2(Ir1−xRhx)3Si5, and (Lu1−xScx)2Ir3Si5

N. S. Sangeetha, A. Thamizhavel, C. V. Tomy, Saurabh Basu, A. M. Awasthi, S. Ramakrishnan, D. Pal

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.024524 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We explore the interplay and competition between superconductivity (SC) and the charge density wave (CDW) ordering transition on pseudoternary alloys (Lu1−xScx)2Ir3Si5, Lu2(Ir1−xRhx)3Si5, and Lu2Ir3(Si1−xGex)5 via magnetization, thermal and transport measurements. We track the evolution of the superconducting transition temperature TSC and the CDW ordering transition temperature TCDW as a function of doping concentration x to present a temperature-concentration phase diagram for each of the series of compounds. We find that as we increase x, TCDW and TSC show a nonmonotonic behavior in Lu2Ir3(Si1−xGex)5. Here, we observe that both CDW and SC survive till 20% of the Ge substitution. In Lu2(Ir1−xRhx)3Si5, as Rh concentration increases, TCDW varies rapidly from 207 to 284 K, whereas the TSC changes gradually from 5.5 to 2.5 K. In addition, the Sc substitution at the Lu site of Lu2Ir3Si5 displays a slight change in CDW transition temperature, without affecting the SC ordering temperature too much. Our study reveals that the CDW anomalies are broadened and smeared out, probably by substitutional disorder effects. The heat capacity data in the vicinity of the CDW transition for all the substituted alloys are analyzed using a model of critical fluctuations in addition to a mean-field contribution and a smooth lattice background. The critical exponent changes appreciably with increasing disorder, which suggests that the first-order CDW transition in the parent compound Lu2Ir3Si5 changes to a second-order transition via doping.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Lu2Ir3Si5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.5Pressure not reportedunknown
Lu2Ir3Ge5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.8Pressure not reportedunknown
Lu2Ir3Si5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.5Pressure not reportedonset
Lu2(Ir1-xRhx)3Si5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.5Pressure not reportedonset
Lu2Ir3(Si1-xGex)5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7.7Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers