Athermal energy loss from x-rays deposited in thin superconducting films on solid substrates
Alexander G. Kozorezov, Colin J. Lambert, Simon R. Bandler, Manuel A. Balvin, Sarah E. Busch, Peter N. Nagler, Jan-Patrick Porst, Stephen J. Smith, Thomas R. Stevenson, John E. Sadleir
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.104504 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
When energy is deposited in a thin-film cryogenic detector, such as from the absorption of an x-ray, an important feature that determines the energy resolution is the amount of athermal energy that can be lost to the heat bath prior to the elementary excitation systems coming into thermal equilibrium. This form of energy loss will be position dependent and therefore can limit the detector energy resolution. An understanding of the physical processes that occur when elementary excitations are generated in metal films on dielectric substrates is important for the design and optimization of a number of different types of low-temperature detectors. We have measured the total energy loss in one relatively simple geometry that allows us to study these processes and compare measurements with calculation based upon a model for the various different processes. We have modeled the athermal phonon energy loss in this device by finding an evolving phonon distribution function that solves the system of kinetic equations for the interacting system of electrons and phonons. Using measurements of device parameters such as the Debye energy and the thermal diffusivity we have calculated the expected energy loss from this detector geometry, and also the position-dependent variation of this loss. We have also calculated the predicted impact on measured spectral lineshapes and have shown that they agree well with measurements. In addition, we have tested this model by using it to predict the performance of a number of other types of detector with different geometries, where good agreement is also found.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoAu Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Effect of temperature oscillations on kinetic inductance and depairing in thin and narrow superconducting nanowire resonators
similarity 0.86Jason P. Allmaras et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle diffusion and the energy resolution of superconducting tunneling junctions as photon detectors. I. Theory
similarity 0.86A. G. Kozorezov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of Thermal Phase Fluctuations in a Two-Dimensional Superconductor: An Exact Result for the Spectral Function
similarity 0.85A. M. Tsvelik & F. H. L. Essler
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Disorder-induced changes of superconducting Tc obtained by low-temperature ion irradiation of simple metals and alloys
similarity 0.85W. Miehle et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental Test of Theories of the Detection Mechanism in a Nanowire Superconducting Single Photon Detector
similarity 0.84J. J. Renema et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determining interface dielectric losses in superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators
similarity 0.84Wayne Woods et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1808.10347
Source status unknown — claims are unverified