Vortex flipping in superconductor/ferromagnet spin-valve structures
E. J. Patiño, M. Aprili, M. G. Blamire, Y. Maeno
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.214514 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report in-plane magnetization measurements on Ni/Nb/Ni/CoO and Co/Nb/Co/CoO spin valve structures with one of the ferromagnetic layers pinned by an antiferromagnetic layer. In samples with Ni below the superconducting transition Tc, our results show strong evidence of vortex flipping driven by ferromagnet magnetization. This is a direct consequence of the proximity effect that leads to vortex supercurrent leakage into the ferromagnets. Here, the polarized electron spins are subject to the vortices’ magnetic field, occasioning vortex flipping. Such a novel mechanism has been made possible by fabrication of the ferromagnet/superconductor/ferromagnet/antiferromagnet multilayered spin valves with an S layer thin enough to barely confine vortices inside as well as F layers thin enough to align and control magnetization within the plane. When Co is used, the vortex flipping effect is not observed. This is attributed to the shorter coherence length of Co. Interestingly, a reduction in the pinning field of about 400 Oe is observed instead when the Nb layer is in the superconducting state. This effect cannot be explained in terms of vortex fields. In view of these facts, any explanation must be directly related to the proximity effect and thus a remarkable phenomenon that deserves further investigation.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.4 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Hysteretic Vortex Pinning in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Nanocomposites
similarity 0.95A. Palau et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Inverse spin switch effects in ferromagnet-superconductor-ferromagnet trilayers with strong ferromagnets
similarity 0.94A. Yu. Rusanov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex-slip transitions in superconducting a−NbGe mesoscopic channels
similarity 0.93N. Kokubo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Altering the Superconductor Transition Temperature by Domain-Wall Arrangements in Hybrid Ferromagnet-Superconductor Structures
similarity 0.93L. Y. Zhu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental evidence of photoinduced vortex crossing in current carrying superconducting strips
similarity 0.93A. Casaburi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of dimensionality on the vortex dynamics in a type-II superconductor
similarity 0.93Hemanta Kumar Kundu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified