Suppression of geometric barrier in type-II superconducting strips
R. Willa, V. B. Geshkenbein, G. Blatter
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.104514 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the magnetic response of a superconducting double strip, i.e., two parallel coplanar thin strips of width 2w, thickness d≪w, and infinite length, separated by a gap of width 2s and subject to a perpendicular magnetic field H. The magnetic properties of this system are governed by the presence of a geometric energy barrier for vortex penetration which we investigate as a function of applied field H and gap parameter s. The new results deal with the case of a narrow gap s≪w, where the field penetration from the inner edges is facilitated by large flux focusing. Upon reducing the gap width 2s, we observe a considerable rearrangement of the screening currents, leading to a strong reduction of the penetration field and the overall magnetization loop, with a suppression factor reaching ∼(d/w)1/2 as the gap drops below the sample thickness, 2s<d. We compare our results with similar systems of different shapes (elliptic and rectangular platelet) and include effects of surface barriers as well. Furthermore, we verify that corrections arising from the magnetic response of the Shubnikov phase in the penetrated state are small and can be omitted. Extending the analysis to multiple strips, we determine the specific sequence of flux penetrations into the different strips. Our studies are relevant for the understanding of platelet-shaped samples with cracks or the penetration into layered superconductors at oblique magnetic fields.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Quantum Terahertz Electrodynamics and Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling in Layered Superconductors
similarity 0.96Sergey Savel’ev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermally activated depinning in polycrystalline Bi-based high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.96A. Gupta et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of quantum magnetic and potential scattering around Zn and Ni impurity ions in superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.96Guang-Ming Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phenomenological and spectroscopic evidence for defect-induced high-temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.96J. C. Phillips
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression of Geometric Barrier in Type II Superconducting Strips
similarity 0.95R. Willa et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1402.4665
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Geometrical Barriers in High-Temperature Superconductors
similarity 0.95E. Zeldov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified